Asus PRIME B365M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B365M-C (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '24 at 16:23
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$173 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 241 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 687 73% 584 Pts	64-Core 688 43% 688 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.4% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 74.3 Parallax 73.9 54% 71.6 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 67.3 55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 393 395 390 395 397 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 2,425 Write 2,195 Mixed 1,455 SusWrite 571 370% 1,662 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 72.9 246% 83.8 MB/s	DQ Read 75.8 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 109 100% 148 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 302%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 21GB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 134 159 129 150 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 153 Write 161 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 145 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.3 227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 108GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 144 144 147 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 146 70% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 49GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 104 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 103 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 285GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 104 105 105 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 105 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 44.4 Write 49.2 Mixed 23.5 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 441GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 97 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 76.8 61% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 100%
WD Elements 2621 1TB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 93.3 Write 84.7 Mixed 62.2 99% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FD 2x8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.9 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 23.7 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	27.5"	1920 1017	SAM0C4D U28E590

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B365M-C Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-C

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	36x
Core i5-8500Intel $173Bench 82%, 43,089 samples	30x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 78%, 175 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 44%, 13,628 samples	5x
1x16GBAdataBench 47%, 6,485 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16