PC NH5xAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC NH5xAx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NH5xAx
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '24 at 14:51
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 728
75% 604 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 139
Parallax 92.8
82% 111 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 81.9
80% 101 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
1TB PCS 2.5" SSD 1TB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 365 378 412 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 490
Write 396
Mixed 381
SusWrite 288
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 23.5
111% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 33.7
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X32GE2666C18S2 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 29.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004B
Typical NH5xAx Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: PC NH5xAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 146% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback