To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '24 at 12:34
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 173 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 682 61% 514 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB 1,828 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 71 64 75 75 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 457 Write 427 Mixed 353 SusWrite 80.9 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 21.3 72% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 181 152% 221 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 91%
DGSR2001TS93T 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 138GB free Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 228 229 67 102 176 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51% Above average	Read 251 Write 229 Mixed 233 SusWrite 173 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 18.3 73% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 38.1 68% 134 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 101GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 112 114 113 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 131 Write 132 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 113 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 92GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 79 82 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 77.1 Write 76.4 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 79.3 53% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 33.9 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	54	24	75	0"	1920 1017

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	713x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16