MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '24 at 08:34
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,099
99% 833 Pts
64-Core 1,523
94% 1,523 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 120
Parallax 107
85% 110 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 103
Splatting 90.4
79% 97.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 157 168 144 56 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 469
Mixed 387
SusWrite 167
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 40.4
149% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 209
195% 300 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
253GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 291 228 233 235 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
93.7% Outstanding
Read 273
Write 105
Mixed 266
SusWrite 281
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 44.9
165% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 239
207% 303 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 102%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
20GB free
Firmware: UE220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 83 81 67 47 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 142
Write 317
Mixed 281
SusWrite 80.6
47% 205 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 10.8
74% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 29.7
43% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 53%
MLD M300 NVMe SSD 250GB
143GB free
Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 843 212 213 213 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,283
Write 1,160
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 476
227% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 74.6
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 733
588% 813 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 202%
Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
630GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 182 185 180 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 68.1
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 181
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GVRB Kingston KHX2933C17D4/8G F4-3000C16-8GVRB Kingston KHX2933C17D4/8G 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 33.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 34.9
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 26" 1280 720 AOC2410 AG241QG4
Typical B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $657
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback