MSI B450M BAZOOKA V2 (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI B450M BAZOOKA V2 (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '24 at 06:18
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 714
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 909
56% 909 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 128
Parallax 117
88% 118 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 124
Splatting 110
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$49
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 439 439 438 440 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 1,488
Mixed 1,371
SusWrite 469
286% 1,280 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 52.8
174% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 585
423% 555 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 179%
Great: 238%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
223GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 169 175 182 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 274
Write 263
Mixed 274
SusWrite 173
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 38.7
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 151
135% 201 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000 256GB
67GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 323 315 314 315 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 362
Write 369
Mixed 340
SusWrite 318
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 27.1
86% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 147
106% 138 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 120%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
104GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 51 53 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 45.5
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 51.5
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 26.2
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical B450M BAZOOKA V2 (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M BAZOOKA V2 (MS-7A38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback