MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 476%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 645%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics387% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive501% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNZXT, MS-7E06
MotherboardMSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)  (all builds)
Memory49.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231027
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 19:30
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 234
2-Core 470
133% 262 Pts
4-Core 944
8-Core 1,832
164% 1,388 Pts
64-Core 4,405
273% 4,405 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
PNY(196E 13DA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
387% Outstanding
Lighting 626
Reflection 585
Parallax 745
510% 652 fps
MRender 515
Gravity 598
Splatting 266
357% 460 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 387%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 1TB
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3405 3638 3733 2719 1084 473 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
501% Outstanding
Read 3,718
Write 3,834
Mixed 2,710
SusWrite 2,508
718% 3,193 MB/s
4K Read 80
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 108
395% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 2,078
DQ Write 1,401
DQ Mixed 1,835
1,344% 1,771 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 501%
Great: 598%
WD Blue SN580 1TB
716GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3318 3651 3550 3659 3759 3739 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
574% Outstanding
Read 3,808
Write 3,832
Mixed 2,649
SusWrite 3,613
783% 3,475 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 101
355% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,351
DQ Write 1,764
DQ Mixed 2,002
1,512% 2,039 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 574%
Great: 598%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
494GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2330 2385 2423 2412 2340 2314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
412% Outstanding
Read 2,462
Write 2,300
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 2,367
482% 2,141 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 91.4
306% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,886
DQ Write 1,427
DQ Mixed 1,608
1,216% 1,640 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 412%
Great: 425%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
288GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3040 2625 1646 1639 1637 1630 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,678
Write 3,006
Mixed 2,761
SusWrite 2,036
591% 2,620 MB/s
4K Read 74.8
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 114
374% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,824
DQ Write 1,354
DQ Mixed 1,561
1,174% 1,580 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 419%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 79.8
MC Write 73.5
MC Mixed 74
216% 75.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 192%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06) Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback