ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MACHINIST
Motherboard	MACHINIST E5-K9
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230616
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '24 at 05:13
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 129 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 164 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 218 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Lighting 43.8 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 38.8 36% 41.1 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 42.7 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 429 434 435 436 434 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 436 Mixed 388 SusWrite 430 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 41.5 145% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 284 231% 327 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 125%
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 337GB free Firmware: VC2S038E SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 1391 1421 1019 112 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 1,879 Write 1,480 Mixed 1,211 SusWrite 899 306% 1,367 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 56 200% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 689 DQ Write 567 DQ Mixed 640 476% 632 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 272%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 169 Write 172 Mixed 37.1 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 9GB free Firmware: ES2OA90B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 76.2 Write 60.9 Mixed 40.8 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 22.6 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	44	60	32"	1280 720	EPI2443 EPI2443

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback