bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	9.4 GB free of 13.9512 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '24 at 21:41
Run Duration	436 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core 280 User benchmarks, average bench 56% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 62 1-Core 104 2-Core 183 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 274 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.2% Poor	Read 70.4 Write 62.1 Mixed 70 SusWrite 37.7 14% 60 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 17.4 73% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 10.1 DQ Mixed 19.8 15% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 94GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 85GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 29 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.8% Poor	Read 66.4 Write 65.8 Mixed 67 SusWrite 29.7 13% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 20.8 66% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 32.6 DQ Mixed 33.1 25% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 71GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 0, 0, 0 MHz 59392, 948, 13312 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 36.3 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 27 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	35	21	32	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,042x
Core i7-2600Intel $158Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,580x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	940x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,055x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	431x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	519x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	298x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $173	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16