Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 18:31
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 354
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,350
120% 1,018 Pts
64-Core 2932
182% 2932 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 199
Parallax 118
111% 151 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 122
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,141
Write 443
Mixed 1490
297% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74
244% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 323
247% 339 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
hp x770w 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: PMAP
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 38.6
Write 17.4
Mixed 29.5
6% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 15.8
54% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 28.5
21% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 72%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
173GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 461
Mixed 430
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 35.3
137% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 294
225% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: 711240WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,159
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,514
353% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.5
222% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 323
248% 342 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 333%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 137
Mixed 70.6
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 76%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 225
Write 226
Mixed 101
136% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.3
409% 4.53 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 5.1
DQ Mixed 5.2
46% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
710GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 173
Mixed 78.7
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 28.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 2560 1377 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2 Builds (Compare 3,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback