Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory41.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 17:55
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 842
80% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8672) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 115
Parallax 134
107% 127 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 106
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS 100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 315 369 366 368 333 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 432
Write 385
Mixed 328
SusWrite 335
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 39.7
132% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 141
121% 180 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 107%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
138GB free
Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 528 544 591 610 609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 1,751
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 677
292% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 41.1
139% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 477
316% 380 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 154%
Great: 262%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
127GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 80
Write 82.8
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 73.8
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD42PURU-78C4CY0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 171 171 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 43.4
Write 189
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 171
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FD LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback