Asus PRIME Z690-P D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P D4  (all builds)
Memory37.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 17:50
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$159
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 190
2-Core 384
116% 221 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,259
122% 1,002 Pts
64-Core 1,782
110% 1,782 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3990) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 114
Parallax 255
118% 171 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 152
Splatting 206
160% 195 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 126%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2049 1894 1732 1626 1454 1292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 2693
Write 2,497
Mixed 2,417
SusWrite 1,674
522% 2,320 MB/s
4K Read 84.3
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 123
410% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1834
DQ Write 1,446
DQ Mixed 1,629
1,222% 1,636 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 410%
Great: 435%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
547GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 103 106 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 99.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 104
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
97GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 89 87 92 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 124
Write 100
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 93.3
108% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 40.2
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 33.5
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 41 144 27" 2560 1369 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical PRIME Z690-P D4 Builds (Compare 9,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P D4 - $306

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback