Pcspecialist Amd Am5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 242%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 315%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive463% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemPcspecialist Amd Am5  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B650M DS3H
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 17:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 213
2-Core 421
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1,634
145% 1,230 Pts
64-Core 3,730
231% 3,730 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Gainward(10B0 F295) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 423
Parallax 288
225% 329 fps
MRender 486
Gravity 297
Splatting 213
258% 332 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 209%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3084 3198 3327 1584 1561 1550 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
463% Outstanding
Read 2,868
Write 3,500
Mixed 3,195
SusWrite 2,384
675% 2,987 MB/s
4K Read 80.7
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 120
400% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,938
DQ Write 1,568
DQ Mixed 1,741
1,306% 1,749 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 463%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH5X16G1B60Z40A2 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
173% Outstanding
MC Read 69.8
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 59.5
179% 62.6 GB/s
SC Read 51.1
SC Write 66.2
SC Mixed 56.9
166% 58.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 173%
Great: 210%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DB5 MSI G32CQ4
Typical Amd Am5 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 396%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Amd Am5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback