Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 53.6 30% 45.2 Pts	4-Core 60 8-Core 61 8% 60.5 Pts	64-Core 58.1 4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6232) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 14.4 12% 13 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 15.3 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AT422 512GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.30.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 178 189 202 207 207 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.5% Average	Read 225 Write 206 Mixed 192 SusWrite 190 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 10.8 56% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 25.5 51% 104 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF Adata Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 10GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	51	60	26"	1280 720	XXX0000 AAA

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16