Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory20 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 02:19
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 253
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 890
83% 694 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 102
Parallax 106
92% 107 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 86.7
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 291 287 272 293 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 858
Write 308
Mixed 391
SusWrite 292
102% 462 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 27.4
112% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 337
269% 380 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 153%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
823GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 153 152 155 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 121
Write 145
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 153
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ RD 500GB
28GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 55 56 57 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 56.1
Write 51.9
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 54.3
68% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 38%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
38GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 65.7
Write 52.2
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 67.8
75% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G KF2666C16D4/16G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 737 131 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3468 HP E243
Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback