Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 23:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 272
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 925
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,481
92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5060 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 250
Parallax 317
240% 287 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 236
Splatting 170
196% 250 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 200%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vpn110 512GB 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32A0T54B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1810 1292 1425 1285 590 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,715
Write 1,847
Mixed 1,450
SusWrite 1,137
398% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 86.5
297% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 570
574% 934 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 320%
Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 195 191 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 177
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 192
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
96GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 116 116 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 115
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 33.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 31.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0669 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $728
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback