HP Pavilion All-in-One 24-xa0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One 24-xa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84EF
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 153
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 446
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84EF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.61% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 16
9% 11.9 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 11.1
8% 10 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 842
Write 347
Mixed 573
129% 587 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 41
135% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 233
195% 279 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 139%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
598GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 105 95 110 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 75.9
Write 101
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 106
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 3
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN4025 HP ALL-in-One
Typical Pavilion All-in-One 24-xa0xxx Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One 24-xa0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback