Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140129
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 14:14
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GHA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 553
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 211 221 211 240 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 333
Write 151
Mixed 237
SusWrite 223
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 30.4
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 150
133% 201 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 98%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$90
52GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 53 46 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 111
Write 87.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 50.1
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
39GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 59 60 58 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 57.7
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 58.9
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 22 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $747
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback