Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '24 at 03:33
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 120 56% 90 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 276 31% 246 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 53.6 Reflection 55.6 Parallax 73.5 44% 60.9 fps	MRender 57.6 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 43.4 42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC72203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 208 208 201 184 209 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.3% Above average	Read 243 Write 212 Mixed 177 SusWrite 201 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 27.2 93% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 113 92% 132 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 760GB free Firmware: JA0OA480 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 96 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 97.4 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 96.3 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung LO8G1600CL11 2x8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM 333 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.3% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	23	60	31.5"	1280 720	SAM7000 C32R50x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	123x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	65x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	49x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16