Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 112
54% 84 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 240
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 31.3
25% 30.7 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 32
Splatting 19.9
22% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 364 353 368 367 358 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 652
Write 438
Mixed 557
SusWrite 359
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 55.3
180% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 288
223% 302 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 118%
Great: 508%
VTP512GSSD1 512GB
99GB free
Firmware: V1102A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 7.3 7.5 7.6 113 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 451
Write 45
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 28.3
28% 133 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 04CB 63GB
2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 34.1" 2560 1009 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback