Asrock H91M-S1 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H91M-S1 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1250 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141021
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	PSE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 145 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 231 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3509 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71% Very good	Lighting 89.8 Reflection 83.7 Parallax 80.6 73% 84.7 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 74.7 Splatting 68.4 67% 84 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 164 137 140 127 139 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 247 Write 234 Mixed 208 SusWrite 138 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 11.8 46% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 76.2 76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 116%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60 5,100 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 632GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 75 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 75.7 Write 70.6 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 73 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	24"	1280 720	GSM5B72 24GL600F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H91M-S1 PLUS Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H91M-S1 PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	6x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	2x
Pentium G3220Intel $36Bench 48%, 19,337 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	2x

SSD
512GB SATA SSD 512GBScudaBench 69%, 25 samples	3x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x

RAM
DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 409 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x
99P5474-055.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 264 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16