Intel X99H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 02:31
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 654
59% 494 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 512G 512GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0523B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1609
Write 900
Mixed 981
257% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 22.3
121% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 93.3
142% 264 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 229%
Walram 1TB 1TB
416GB free
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 400 402 398 402 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 406
Write 413
Mixed 362
SusWrite 401
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 28
116% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 51.4
93% 180 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 453%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
109GB free
Firmware: B1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 135 134 136 134 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 222
Write 128
Mixed 154
SusWrite 150
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 20.1
79% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.3
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 42.9
33% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 85%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
9GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 19
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.9
32% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.9% Above average
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 10 84 0" 1600 900
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback