Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 00:10
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 140
60% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 478
44% 371 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 79.7
50% 66.2 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 43.6
45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 351
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 392
Mixed 230
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 23.7
93% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 26.7
42% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
44GB free
Firmware: 752
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 228 224 222 222 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.4% Good
Read 244
Write 228
Mixed 234
SusWrite 223
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 32.8
112% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 185
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
153GB free
Firmware: A3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 99 103 102 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 74
Write 74.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 102
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 74%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
637GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 18 13 13 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 14.9
Mixed 14
SusWrite 18.1
27% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 7.2" 1280 720 RGT1352
Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback