Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 23:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 183
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 253
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 41.1
35% 49.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.1
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD07S 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 35 35 32 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 467
Write 349
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 77.1
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 4.6
38% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 1
18% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 74 69 73 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 74.5
Write 70
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 73.1
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 0420 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM070C SMB2270HD
Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback