Lenovo 90T1004CMW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90T1004CMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3741
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 19:48
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 309
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 926
89% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
MSI(1462 3852) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 72.1
59% 73 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 56.9
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPETJ512MGE2QDQ 512GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5Q0630
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,643
Write 1,789
Mixed 1,505
437% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 73.9
261% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 28.8
278% 673 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 374%
SAMSUNG HM120JI 120GB
14GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 23.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 18.2
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 72 27" 1920 1057 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical 90T1004CMW Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90T1004CMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback