Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100-$145 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 192 62% 113 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 278 35% 266 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 295% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 72 71 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 490 Write 341 Mixed 303 SusWrite 74.3 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 40.1 126% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 600 DQ Write 383 DQ Mixed 584 410% 522 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 426%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E1 2x16GB 859 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	30	25	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	50x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	15x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	3x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	16x
MTFDDAK256TDL-1AW1ZABFA 256GBCrucialBench 84%, 196 samples	5x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	4x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	19x
KHYXPX-MIE 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 215 samples	4x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16