MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 07:19
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 176
2-Core 348
104% 200 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,195
111% 927 Pts
64-Core 1,543
96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
199% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 263
Parallax 540
201% 350 fps
MRender 418
Gravity 217
Splatting 340
266% 325 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 199%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 175
Mixed 214
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 35.4
141% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 164
132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 455
Mixed 448
105% 470 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 54.9
182% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
278GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2893
Write 3,379
Mixed 3,081
699% 3,118 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 110
359% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,239
933% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
283GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 380
Mixed 199
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 7.3
62% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 34.1
41% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 189
Write 162
Mixed 85.4
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 71.5
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
29GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 22.7
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
96% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 19% 32 211 57 144 34" 1280 720 VTK3400 GNV34DBE
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback