Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 562
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 194
Parallax 190
152% 190 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 192
Splatting 128
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 288 361 354 358 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 381
Mixed 379
SusWrite 316
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 46.5
151% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC17B PHL 276E9Q
Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback