Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 19:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 60.3
1-Core 188
2-Core 372
105% 207 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,108
111% 901 Pts
64-Core 1380
85% 1380 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3812) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.20.24.03
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 73.7
39% 50.6 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 86.1
51% 58.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-1T00-1101 1TB
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1924 481 325 329 327 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,926
Write 2,859
Mixed 2,445
SusWrite 620
495% 2,212 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 48
163% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,702
DQ Write 1313
DQ Mixed 1,456
1,103% 1,490 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 272%
Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 44.2
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 40.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 52.9
118% 41.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27.6" 1280 720 SAM7307 S39C
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback