Gigabyte GA-AERO 5 XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 5 XE  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 17:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 166
2-Core 330
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 996
102% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 15E1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 28.4
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 20.1
22% 27 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2389 2129 2089 1706 1693 1641 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 1618
Mixed 1,569
SusWrite 1,941
366% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 108
340% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1,235
DQ Mixed 1,410
1,054% 1,408 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 341%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-072.A01G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 37.2
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 24.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 30 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC415F
Typical GA-AERO 5 XE Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 5 XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback