Wortmann_ag 1009597;2110105

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag 1009597;2110105  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B360M-C
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 12:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 668
72% 571 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 106
Parallax 115
93% 112 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 110
Splatting 102
102% 128 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1845 910 830 820 831 828 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,031
Write 1,771
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 1,011
355% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 730
548% 737 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 218%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 23.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1463 751 165 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC263 PHL24M1N3200Z
Typical 1009597;2110105 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: Wortmann_ag 1009597;2110105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback