Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 18:46
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 301
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 925
91% 747 Pts
64-Core 1084
67% 1084 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 866B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 201
Parallax 228
170% 212 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 207
Splatting 154
164% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso NVME 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 383 364 231 338 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,665
Write 976
Mixed 896
SusWrite 343
215% 970 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 30
211% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 468
441% 684 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 183%
Great: 196%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
168GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1431 1381 1324 1253 1190 1140 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,597
Write 2,095
Mixed 1,851
SusWrite 1,287
438% 1,957 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 86.5
282% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 1005
758% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 410%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
161GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 433 200 93 47 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 447
Mixed 429
SusWrite 221
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 32.5
151% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 51
117% 240 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 100%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
91GB free
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 301 301 300 302 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 297
Mixed 273
SusWrite 298
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 37.5
160% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 252
213% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
48GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 226 213 217 213 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 401
Write 404
Mixed 337
SusWrite 230
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 41.8
149% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 214
186% 274 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 37.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 27" 1920 1009 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback