Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220803
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 18:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 51
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 144
50% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 275
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 1
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 346 347 316 340 332 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 410
Write 355
Mixed 368
SusWrite 340
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 35.1
122% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 266
192% 243 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 0.7" 1280 720 FNI0000 LCD TV
Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback