Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 15:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 122
59% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 356
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 87.6
80% 93.4 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 74.9
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102G9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 77 76 80 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 232
Write 62.7
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 71.3
22% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 7.2
17% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 16.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 26% 27 186 14 60 25.5" 1680 1027 IVM6603 PLE2607WSD
Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback