Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 21:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 165
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 614
54% 460 Pts
64-Core 1,449
90% 1,449 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 5700 XT
PowerColor(148C 2398) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 191
Parallax 205
91% 169 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 92.8
90% 113 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 436
Mixed 389
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 41.6
134% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 351
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 111%
Jmicron Tech 512GB
309GB free
Firmware: 0214
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51
Write 37.5
Mixed 39.2
32% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 10.1
1,741% 9.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 21%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
7GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 16.5
Mixed 43
64% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.8
92% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 19.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 0P 5R 9G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 38% 40 463 372 144 24" 1920 1017 GSM5C00 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback