MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 15:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 950
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 2,385
148% 2,385 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 215
Parallax 244
179% 226 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 220
Splatting 182
179% 225 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,448
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,640
471% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.7
220% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 864
635% 841 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 25 213 57 60 27" 2560 1369 ACI27A3 ASUS PB278
Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback