MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 918
89% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,351
84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 79.2
78% 89.2 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 72.6
46% 55.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 45 31 77 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 423
Write 368
Mixed 304
SusWrite 46.9
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 14.4
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 33
44% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 7G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 18% 100 172 3 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback