Lenovo 82J4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82J4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 19:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 29.9
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 134
30% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 176
29% 207 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3806) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 8
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 215 332 215 71 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 32.2
Write 188
Mixed 234
SusWrite 213
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 18.6
60% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 217
178% 259 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 319
13% 319 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 5% 44 73 53 60 11.6" 1280 720 AUO635C
Typical 82J4 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82J4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback