Corsair VOYAGER a1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCorsair VOYAGER a1600  (all builds)
MotherboardCorsair Voyager a1600
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 15:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 212
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 811
73% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1CFA 0004) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 69.1
37% 56.1 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 26.5
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00A00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 1312 1348 1475 1368 1560 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,689
Write 1,452
Mixed 1,489
SusWrite 1,398
339% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 54.8
176% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 909
598% 716 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 235%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5S16G3A48Z40A2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 42.7
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 31.2
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 124%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 8% 13 188 32 60 16" 1707 996 BOE0A3B
Typical VOYAGER a1600 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Corsair VOYAGER a1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback