Asrock X370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 12:21
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 652
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Asus(1043 045B) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 30.6
19% 28.6 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 21.4
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDBRPG5000ANC-WR 500GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 488 490 483 484 496 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 679
Write 597
Mixed 635
SusWrite 494
135% 601 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.9
204% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 617
DQ Mixed 728
535% 704 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 151%
Great: 277%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
837GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 134 130 134 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical X370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback