Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 114% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '24 at 11:56
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	MNG-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$231 65,651 User benchmarks, average bench 101% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 75.4 1-Core 168 2-Core 309 98% 184 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 953 95% 776 Pts	64-Core 1,564 97% 1,564 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 178 Parallax 172 134% 171 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 174 Splatting 122 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11L 256GB 264 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 524 103 108 107 102 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,950 Write 923 Mixed 876 SusWrite 302 223% 1,013 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 47.2 171% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 687 DQ Mixed 470 375% 514 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 232%
T253T2512G0C101 512GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 15GB free Firmware: S1128B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 500 Write 385 Mixed 12.5 65% 299 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 0.3 37% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 0.3 18% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GB 6,228 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 0P 2R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	59%	22	215	57	165	23.8"	1920 1009	AUS242B ASUS VG247Q1A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $231Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	984x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	729x
Core i9-11900KIntel $254Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	458x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	378x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	346x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	335x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	276x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	250x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	200x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	113x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $640

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16