Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '24 at 19:41
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 218 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 780 72% 604 Pts	64-Core 1,137 70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41% Average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 55 Parallax 72.5 41% 59.3 fps	MRender 55.3 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 41.2 41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650NS38 240GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: P191 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 220 193 150 75 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 378 Write 198 Mixed 257 SusWrite 159 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 27.1 112% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 68.9 75% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 204GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 125 123 121 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 162 Write 169 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 124 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB 16,105 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	20"	1280 720	GSM4EBF E2060

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	12x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	11x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	12x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	3x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 46%, 6,545 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 84%, 15,358 samples	3x
DDR4 2666 2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 4,790 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16