Asus PRIME A520M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 17:47
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 256
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 800
75% 624 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 127
Parallax 137
114% 135 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 100
Splatting 95.5
89% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFKKN02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,185
Write 1,727
Mixed 1339
319% 1,417 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 47.2
157% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,091
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 907
670% 892 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2324CH.002 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 9G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 56% 32 211 57 165 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DA6 MSI G32C4
Typical PRIME A520M-A Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback