Lenovo 82S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 16:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 55.9
1-Core 175
2-Core 331
96% 187 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 702
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 13.3
9% 14.2 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 0.5
8% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0013P6LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 60 63 63 63 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,035
Mixed 892
SusWrite 86.6
187% 844 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 70.2
234% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 273
254% 401 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 153%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 29.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 21
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9056
Typical 82S9 Builds (Compare 1,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback