Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 15:33
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 119
54% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 352
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Asus(1043 88A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 116
104% 114 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 101
Splatting 86.7
75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 342 393 411 415 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 466
Write 416
Mixed 370
SusWrite 359
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 36.8
119% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 232
176% 237 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 111%
Mushkin MKNSSDSR500GB 500GB
54GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 297 45 83 37 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 462
Write 386
Mixed 361
SusWrite 128
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 20.9
90% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 0.7
47% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
645GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 74 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 77.9
Write 76.1
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 74.1
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
232GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 103
Write 14.2
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 31.9
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 37%
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
258GB free
Firmware: 08.02E08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 59.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 64.4
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 8% 12 211 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback