Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 20:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 870
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,149
71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.5% Average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 69.9
40% 58.6 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 58.4
Splatting 42.1
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi3000 Internal PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD 512GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230306a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1725 510 523 380 201 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,941
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 589
348% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 64.9
214% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 600
535% 822 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 222%
Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 18% 56 201 30 100 27" 1920 1080 XMIB011 P27FBA-RAGL
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback