Lenovo 83BS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83BS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 18:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 288
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 557
69% 525 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 381D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.57
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 25.4
12% 21.4 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 22.9
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 1598 1223 1573 1917 2055 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,543
Write 1,901
Mixed 1926
SusWrite 1,599
446% 1,992 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 53.3
191% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 777
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 529
391% 529 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 282%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F512M32D2DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 37
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 25.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 16" 1536 889 LEN8987
Typical 83BS Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 83BS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback