HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-cd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-cd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8487
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 17:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 98
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 326
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 8487) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 707 677 538 434 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 665
Write 785
Mixed 620
SusWrite 594
150% 666 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 51.2
172% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 449
341% 466 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 137%
Great: 219%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO413D
Typical Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-cd0xxx Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-cd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback