bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH67BL
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '24 at 17:06
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 336 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 50.6 Parallax 38.8 30% 42.1 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 28.2 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB 7,147 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1211A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 336 409 139 55 45 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 469 Write 395 Mixed 361 SusWrite 217 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 19.5 88% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 32.1 82% 166 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 139%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 208GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 108 109 109 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 106 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1333 4x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	24.1"	1920 1080	SAM0F90 LC24RG50

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,054x
Core i7-2600Intel $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,581x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	947x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	299x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16