Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 505
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 189
Parallax 214
161% 200 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 201
Splatting 161
160% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 273 390 404 426 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 402
Write 349
Mixed 288
SusWrite 360
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 29.5
101% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 173
172% 278 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
872GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 175 177 179 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 165
Mixed 107
SusWrite 177
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G 04CD F4-3000C16-16GISB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.4% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 11% 44 208 58 50 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32A3 ASUS VG32V
Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback