Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E5513

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E5513  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2FD
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 10:38
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 242
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 403
37% 311 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 00BF) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 12.7
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 11.9
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B07 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7802Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1520 1873 1790 2267 2891 3077 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,318
Write 2,611
Mixed 2,120
SusWrite 2,236
524% 2,321 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 95.4
305% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 581
466% 668 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 357%
Great: 461%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43BB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 32.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 100 27" 1280 720 AUS2745 VA27EHF
Typical LIFEBOOK E5513 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E5513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback